G
Guest

Method Statement: Industrial Wearing Screed Installation (Warehouses & Plant Rooms) inspection and test plan example.

Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement: Industrial Wearing Screed Installation (Warehouses & Plant Rooms)

AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.

Published 19 Oct 2026 Rev. 00 4 views
About this ITP: Defines inspection points, tests, and acceptance criteria for industrial wearing screed works. Includes hold/witness points and documentation requirements.

More than a static template

Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.

  • AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
  • Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
  • Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
  • Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.

What you can customize

When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:

  • Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
  • Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
  • Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
  • Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
  • Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
  • Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.

Why this ITP is used

To ensure the screed installation meets design, durability, and flatness requirements with traceable inspections and tests.

Who uses this inspection and test plan

Contractor QA/QC, Site Engineers, HSE Officers, Independent Labs, and the Engineer/Client's Representative.

When this ITP is prepared and submitted

From pre-construction submittals through substrate prep, reinforcement, screed placement, curing, to final acceptance testing and handover.

Who receives or approves this ITP

Engineer/Client Representative for approval at hold/witness points.

Inspection scope

Materials, substrate prep, reinforcement, bonding, placing, finishing, curing, joints, strength, abrasion, bond, and SR/falls.

Typical hold, witness, and review points

Substrate prep (H), reinforcement (H), trial bay (H), first bay placing (W), curing (W), 7-day tests (H), 28-day tests (H), SR/falls (H).

Typical inspection records

IRs, test reports, batch logs, survey reports, PTW, calibration certificates, approvals, NCR/CAR closeouts.

Important approval note

This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.

Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.

Inspection and test plan

Activity Inspection / Test Acceptance Criteria Responsibility Record
Materials approval and delivery Check certificates, TDS Compliant with EN/Spec; within shelf life Contractor QA/QC / Engineer Material approvals; delivery tickets
Substrate preparation (bonded/unbonded) CSP 5–7 (bonded); membrane laps Clean, sound; CSP achieved; membrane lapped ≥150 mm Contractor QA/QC / Engineer IR with photos
Levels and falls set-out Spot level checks Within ±5 mm (level), falls ±0.2% Site Engineer / QA Survey record
Reinforcement placement Cover, laps, supports Per drawings; laps ≥150 mm; stable supports QA/QC / Engineer IR
Bonding slurry application (bonded) Uniformity, timing Wet-on-wet; no dry patches QA/QC / Engineer QA log
Screed mixing and placing Consistency (semi-dry), thickness No segregation; thickness within tolerance QA/QC / Engineer QA log; photos
Surface hardener/densifier application Coverage rate Within ±10% target; even application QA/QC / Engineer Material usage log
Curing Coverage/duration Compound applied uniformly or moist cure maintained ≥7 days QA/QC / Engineer QA log
Early-age testing (7-day trend) EN 13892-2 cubes/prisms; pull-off (prelim) Meets trend vs target; prelim pull-off ≥1.0 MPa [Verify] Lab / QA/QC / Engineer Lab reports
Joint cutting and arrises Depth/cleanliness ≥1/3 depth; clean; layout per drawings QA/QC / Engineer IR
Final testing at 28 days Compressive/flexural (EN 13892-2); abrasion (EN 13892-3); pull-off (EN 1542) ≥CT-C40/50-F7; AR1/AR0.5; pull-off ≥1.5 MPa avg (bonded) Lab / QA/QC / Engineer Certified reports
SR and falls verification 2 m straightedge; digital level SR1/SR2 per spec; falls within ±0.2% Site Engineer / QA / Engineer Survey report

This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.

Frequently asked questions

A typical benchmark is 3 tests per 100 m² with a minimum of 3 per area; verify frequency with project specifications.

Usually AR1; very heavy forklift traffic may require AR0.5. Confirm with the project specification.

Related method statement

This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement: Industrial Wearing Screed Installation (Warehouses & Plant Rooms) method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.

View the Method Statement: Industrial Wearing Screed Installation (Warehouses & Plant Rooms) method statement →

Continue with related inspection, method statement, article, and checklist resources.

Related resources