G
Guest

Method Statement: Laying and Compaction of Final Asphalt Wearing Course inspection and test plan example.

Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement: Laying and Compaction of Final Asphalt Wearing Course

AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.

Published 28 Jun 2026 Rev. 00 2 views
About this ITP: This ITP defines inspection points and acceptance criteria for final asphalt wearing course, covering tack coat, paving temperatures, density, joints, texture, and IRI.

More than a static template

Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.

  • AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
  • Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
  • Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
  • Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.

What you can customize

When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:

  • Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
  • Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
  • Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
  • Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
  • Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
  • Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.

Why this ITP is used

To assure the final asphalt wearing course meets specified durability, texture, and ride quality before opening to traffic.

Who uses this inspection and test plan

Site engineers, QA/QC technicians, the Engineer/Client, paving and roller foremen, and specialist profilers.

When this ITP is prepared and submitted

Applied during production and placement of the wearing course and for post-lay acceptance testing prior to handover.

Who receives or approves this ITP

Engineer/Employer’s Representative for approval and acceptance.

Inspection scope

Substrate checks, tack application, thermal controls, paver setup, compaction, joints, density/thickness, texture, straightedge, and IRI.

Typical hold, witness, and review points

Hold: substrate sign-off, opening to traffic. Witness: tack coat, paver setup/test strip, density testing, joints, texture, and profilometer runs.

Typical inspection records

Daily reports, thermal logs, plant tickets, density and thickness results, joint records, straightedge and texture logs, IRI reports, NCR/CCR forms.

Important approval note

This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.

Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.

Inspection and test plan

Activity Inspection / Test Acceptance Criteria Responsibility Record
Substrate pre-paving inspection Visual, straightedge checks Clean, dry, defect-free, within level tolerance [Verify] Site Engineer / QA / Engineer Pre-pave checklist, photos
Tack coat application Spray rate trays; uniformity check Residual 0.25–0.45 kg/m2; no tracking/pooling [Verify] QA/QC Technician / Engineer (Witness) Spray log, tray test forms
Mix temperature at plant and delivery Probe thermometer + IR gun Discharge 150–175°C; delivery ≥140–165°C [Verify] Plant QA / Site QA Temp logs, tickets
Mixture compliance (AC%, gradation) AASHTO T 308 or ASTM D2172/T30 Within JMF tolerances [Verify] Lab Technician Lab reports
Paver setup and mat thickness (initial) Mat probe/plate check; slope level Thickness ±5 mm; crossfall ±0.2% [Verify] Paving Supervisor / QA Setup sheet
Thermal uniformity behind screed Thermal camera/IR spots across width ΔT across mat ≤10–15°C [Verify] QA/QC Technician Thermal map
Compaction – density (lot basis) Cores (T 166 vs T 209) or correlated nuclear gauge 92–97% of Gmm [Verify] QA/QC Technician / Engineer (Witness) Density reports, lot summary
Joint construction – longitudinal Visual tightness; joint density cores/gauge Joint density ≥ mat −2% (of Gmm) [Verify] Paving Supervisor / QA Joint inspection, density
Joint construction – transverse 3 m straightedge; face prep ≤3 mm deviation in 3 m; sealed, straight joint [Verify] Paving Supervisor / Engineer (Witness) Joint record
Thickness (production) Cored thickness (ASTM D3549) Within ±5 mm of design [Verify] QA/QC Technician Thickness log
Surface regularity 3 m straightedge ≤3 mm in 3 m [Verify] QA/QC Technician / Engineer Straightedge log
Surface texture (macrotexture) ASTM E965 (MTD) or ASTM E1845 (MPD) MTD 0.5–0.8 mm dense AC; SMA per spec [Verify] QA/QC Technician Texture report
Ride quality (IRI) ASTM E950; AASHTO R 57/R 54 IRI ≤1.5 m/km mainline; ≤2.0 m/km ramps [Verify] Profilometer Specialist / QA / Engineer IRI report and plots
Opening to traffic Surface temp, visual integrity Surface <50°C; no deformation; approvals filed Construction Manager / Engineer Opening authorization

This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.

Frequently asked questions

By lane and production quantity (e.g., 200–400 t per lot) or area (e.g., 500 m2), with minimum core counts per lot. Verify per specification.

Only where the specification permits and after correlation to cores. Otherwise, nuclear gauges are for process control, with cores used for acceptance.

Related method statement

This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement: Laying and Compaction of Final Asphalt Wearing Course method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.

View the Method Statement: Laying and Compaction of Final Asphalt Wearing Course method statement →

Related resources