Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement: Bituminous Prime Coat on Prepared Aggregate Base Courses
AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.
More than a static template
Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.
- AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
- Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
- Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
- Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.
What you can customize
When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:
- Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
- Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
- Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
- Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
- Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
- Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.
Why this ITP is used
To ensure the prime coat is applied uniformly at the correct rate, penetrates the base adequately, and cures before overlay, meeting project specifications.
Who uses this inspection and test plan
Site engineers, QA/QC inspectors, contractors, and the Engineer/Client representative.
When this ITP is prepared and submitted
Before, during, and after prime coat application, from base readiness through pre-paving release.
Who receives or approves this ITP
The ITP is usually submitted to the client representative, consultant, resident engineer, or project management consultant for review and approval before the related work activity starts.
Inspection scope
Material verification, temperature control, distributor calibration, application rate, appearance, penetration, and curing prior to overlay.
Typical hold, witness, and review points
Hold: Trial spray/calibration. Witness: First production run and pre-paving release.
Typical inspection records
Calibration sheets, rate check forms, temperature logs, daily spray logs, penetration inspection records, approvals/release forms.
Important approval note
This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.
Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.
Inspection and test plan
| Activity | Inspection / Test | Acceptance Criteria | Responsibility | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base course acceptance prior to priming | Visual, straightedge, moisture check (if required) | Surface clean, dry, and sound; evenness ≤10 mm over 3 m; no loose material; no free moisture. | QA/QC Inspector / Engineer | Base readiness checklist |
| Material receipt – prime binder | Review CoC/MDS, batch/grade verification | Conforms to ASTM D2027 (cutback) or ASTM D2397/D977 (emulsion); correct grade; within shelf life; SDS available. | QA/QC Inspector | Material CoC, delivery tickets |
| Binder temperature – storage and spray line | Thermometer reading at tank and at spray bar | Within target range: cutback 45–60°C (max 85°C), emulsion 40–60°C; stable, no local overheating. [Verify] | QA/QC / Plant Supervisor | Temperature log |
| Distributor calibration – trial spray | ASTM D2995 mat/pan test across full width | Average rate at target; transverse CV ≤10%; nozzles uniform; bar height/speed set. (Hold Point) | QA/QC / Site Engineer / Engineer | Calibration report with calculations |
| Production application rate monitoring | Periodic ASTM D2995 checks during run | Measured rate within ±10% or ±0.10 L/m² of target, whichever greater; uniform appearance; correct overlaps. | QA/QC Inspector | Rate check forms |
| Spray appearance and coverage | Visual during and after spraying | Continuous, streak-free film; no pooling; neat edges; protected utilities and structures. | Site Engineer / QA/QC | Daily report with photos |
| Penetration depth verification | Cut plug/trench inspection with scale | Typical 3–6 mm penetration into ABC; no free binder on surface; no flushing. [Verify] | QA/QC / Engineer | Penetration inspection form, photos |
| Curing status prior to opening/overlay | Foot/tyre pickup check and time/ambient review | No tacky pickup on paper/tyre; emulsion typically 6–24 h, cutback 24–72 h depending on weather. [Verify] | QA/QC / Site Engineer | Curing log / release to traffic |
| Pre-paving condition | Final visual + Engineer’s witness | Surface clean, dry, uniformly primed; excess sand removed; Engineer’s consent to proceed (Witness Point). | QA/QC / Engineer | Pre-paving release record |
This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.
Frequently asked questions
Related method statement
This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement: Bituminous Prime Coat on Prepared Aggregate Base Courses method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.
View the Method Statement: Bituminous Prime Coat on Prepared Aggregate Base Courses method statement →