G
Guest

Method Statement: Gravity Water Leak Testing for Sanitary Drainage Stacks and Underground Gravity Lines inspection and test plan example.

Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement: Gravity Water Leak Testing for Sanitary Drainage Stacks and Underground Gravity Lines

AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.

Published 21 Jul 2026 Rev. 00 3 views
About this ITP: Defines inspection hold/witness points, tests, and records for stack and underground gravity leak testing. Aligns with project specs and recognized standards.

More than a static template

Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.

  • AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
  • Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
  • Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
  • Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.

What you can customize

When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:

  • Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
  • Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
  • Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
  • Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
  • Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
  • Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.

Why this ITP is used

To verify watertightness and compliance before concealment or handover, preventing leaks and subsequent damage.

Who uses this inspection and test plan

MEP engineers, QA/QC personnel, HSE officers, plumbing crews, and Client/Consultant representatives.

When this ITP is prepared and submitted

After installation and cleaning of the drainage system, before concealment/backfilling and commissioning.

Who receives or approves this ITP

Client/Consultant for review and approval before works and for final acceptance.

Inspection scope

Pre-test readiness, plug installation, controlled filling, stabilization, timed leak measurements, 24-hour monitoring for stacks, documentation.

Typical hold, witness, and review points

Hold: Pre-test setup, underground timed test, final acceptance. Witness: Stack fill and initial 15-min check, 24-hour reading.

Typical inspection records

Pre-test checklist, calibration certificates, plug certificates, head readings, top-up volumes, photos, IR/Test certificates.

Important approval note

This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.

Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.

Inspection and test plan

Activity Inspection / Test Acceptance Criteria Responsibility Record
Pre-test readiness inspection Checklist: plugs available, vents/drains identified, access/permits in place, instrumentation calibrated All prerequisites met; drawings/sections confirmed; datum installed and photographed MEP Site Engineer / QA/QC / HSE Pre-test readiness checklist, photos, PTW/permits copies
Plug installation verification Visual check of size, rating, seating, and safety tethers Plugs rated ≥1.5× max test head; correctly installed and secured; no damage to pipework QA/QC Engineer Plug log with serial numbers/certificates
Stack filling and stabilization Head measurement at standpipe/manometer; air bleed confirmation Head ≥3.0 m above highest fitting under test or per spec; stable level after 10–15 min Engineer / QA/QC Fill log; head readings; photos of datum
Stack initial tightness check (15 min) Visual joint inspection and level observation No visible leakage; no measurable level drop in 15 min or within project-specified tolerance [Verify] QA/QC / Client Rep (Witness) Inspection sheet; photo/video evidence
Stack 24-hour level drop monitoring Re-read marked level after 24±2 hours; record temperatures No visible leakage; total drop within project limit (typ. 10–25 mm/24 h per 10 m stack) [Verify] Engineer / QA/QC 24 h log; photos of initial/final levels; temperature log
Underground pipeline hydrostatic test setup Verify downstream plug position; confirm head measurement reference; stabilization time recorded Head target 1.0–5.0 m above crown at highest point; safe setup ready Engineer / QA/QC / HSE Setup checklist; photos; head calc sheet
Underground pipeline hydrostatic test (timed) Top-up volume to maintain constant head over 30 min Water loss within BS EN 1610 allowable limits for pipe/chamber; no visible leakage QA/QC / Client Rep (Hold) Test sheet with volumes, calculations, duration; photos
Drain-down and reinstatement Controlled discharge; area inspection No uncontrolled spills; area clean; system left in safe state Plumbing Foreman / Engineer Drain log; housekeeping checklist
Final documentation and acceptance Review of complete records against ITP All records complete; nonconformities closed; IR/Test certificate signed QA/QC / Client Rep Signed IR; Test Certificate; compiled dossier

This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.

Frequently asked questions

Use BS EN 1610 allowable loss criteria for hydrostatic tests appropriate to pipe diameter/material and manholes. Confirm exact values in project specifications.

By comparing marked datum levels after 24±2 hours and considering project thresholds and any specified temperature correction.

Yes, sectional testing by floor zones is acceptable if it achieves the specified head and is approved by the Consultant.

Related method statement

This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement: Gravity Water Leak Testing for Sanitary Drainage Stacks and Underground Gravity Lines method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.

View the Method Statement: Gravity Water Leak Testing for Sanitary Drainage Stacks and Underground Gravity Lines method statement →

Continue with related inspection, method statement, article, and checklist resources.

Related resources