G
Guest

Method Statement – Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piling Works inspection and test plan example.

Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement – Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piling Works

AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.

Published 18 May 2026 Rev. 00 22 views 13 downloads
About this ITP: The ITP defines hold/witness points and criteria for CFA piling, from platform checks and drilling parameters to continuous pumping, cage insertion, and testing.

More than a static template

Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.

  • AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
  • Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
  • Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
  • Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.

What you can customize

When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:

  • Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
  • Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
  • Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
  • Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
  • Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
  • Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.

Why this ITP is used

To assure piles are executed per design and standards, with verified parameters, materials, and test results before acceptance.

Who uses this inspection and test plan

Contractor QA/QC, Piling Supervisor, Site Engineer, Client/Engineer’s Representative, Testing labs.

When this ITP is prepared and submitted

From pre-start through drilling and concreting to post-construction testing and handover.

Who receives or approves this ITP

Client/Engineer’s Representative for approval.

Inspection scope

Covers platform, set-out, equipment calibration, drilling and pumping parameters, fresh/hardened concrete testing, cage placement, as-built, integrity and load testing.

Typical hold, witness, and review points

Hold: pre-start setup, first pile, integrity/load testing setup. Witness: fresh concrete tests, cage installation, as-built survey.

Typical inspection records

Rig data logs, concrete tickets and test results, cage and cover checks, survey records, PIT/load test reports, trimming inspections.

Important approval note

This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.

Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.

Inspection and test plan

Activity Inspection / Test Acceptance Criteria Responsibility Record
Method Statement/ITP Approval Document review/approval Approved prior to works commencement Contractor QA/QC / Client Rep Approved MS/ITP, distribution sheet
Piling Platform Certification Visual and certificate review Platform certificate valid; platform intact and level within tolerance TWC / QA/QC Platform certificate; daily checklist
Set-out Verification Coordinate/level check Pile center within ±10 mm pre-drill; benchmarks protected Surveyor / QA/QC Set-out report
Equipment Calibration/Pre-Start Check Calibration certificates; pressure line test Valid calibration (≤6 months); no leaks; logger operational Piling Supervisor / QA/QC Calibration certs; pre-start checklist
Concrete Mix Approval Mix design review; trial mix if required Conforms to EN 206 and project requirements Supplier / QA/QC / Client Rep Approved mix design; trial reports
Drilling Parameters Monitoring Logger review (depth, torque, crowd, RPM) Parameters within safe operating ranges; design depth achieved Piling Supervisor / QA/QC Rig data logs
Initial Charging of Auger Toe Pressure/flow verification Stable pressure; no loss of head Rig & Pump Operators / QA/QC Pressure/flow trace
Auger Extraction with Continuous Pumping Volume vs theoretical; extraction rate; pressure Volume factor 1.10–1.35 (soil dependent); positive pressure maintained Piling Supervisor / QA/QC Rig data export; concrete tickets
Fresh Concrete Testing Slump/slump-flow, temp, density; cubes/cylinders Within approved ranges; strength ≥ specified at 28 days QA/QC Technician / Client Rep (witness) Test reports; sampling sheets
Cage Installation and Cover Check Embedment depth and cover verification Cage toe at required depth; cover achieved; verticality acceptable Piling Supervisor / QA/QC Cage checklist; measurements
Pile Top Level and Identification Level check vs cut-off Top level above cut-off by allowance Site Manager / QA/QC Daily log; photos
As-Built Survey Coordinate check at cut-off Within positional tolerance Surveyor / QA/QC As-built record; pile register
Pile Integrity Testing (if specified) PIT per ASTM D5882 No major defects; signatures per acceptance criteria Testing Subcontractor / QA/QC PIT report; acceptance sheet
Static Load Testing (if specified) EN ISO 22477-1 maintained/quick test Load-settlement within design/service limits Testing Subcontractor / Engineer Load test report; calibration certs
Pile Head Trimming Inspection Visual; soundness check Sound concrete at cut-off; level tolerance ±10 mm [Verify] QA/QC / Engineer Trimming inspection record

This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.

Frequently asked questions

At pile start and thereafter at least one set per 50 m³ and a minimum of one set per pour/shift, unless project specs require more frequent testing.

Examples include positional/verticality exceedance, unexpected low/high concrete volume vs theoretical, pressure loss during extraction, or concrete strength shortfall.

Only if specified. Many projects require PIT on a percentage of working piles and load tests on selected piles. Requirements must be verified against the project specifications.

Related method statement

This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement – Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piling Works method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.

View the Method Statement – Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piling Works method statement →

Continue with related inspection, method statement, article, and checklist resources.

Related resources