G
Guest

Method Statement – Strip Footing Construction (Excavation to Waterproofing) inspection and test plan example.

Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement – Strip Footing Construction (Excavation to Waterproofing)

AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.

Published 21 May 2026 Rev. 00 2 views
About this ITP: This ITP sets the inspection and testing requirements for strip footings, including excavation checks, concrete testing, reinforcement verification, and waterproofing QA.

More than a static template

Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.

  • AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
  • Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
  • Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
  • Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.

What you can customize

When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:

  • Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
  • Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
  • Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
  • Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
  • Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
  • Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.

Why this ITP is used

To ensure all critical stages of strip footing construction are inspected and tested to meet design and specification requirements.

Who uses this inspection and test plan

Contractor QC, Site Engineers, Specialist Subcontractors, and the Engineer/Client’s Representative.

When this ITP is prepared and submitted

From pre-excavation through backfilling and handover, with defined Hold and Witness points before irreversible work proceeds.

Who receives or approves this ITP

Engineer/Client’s Representative for review and approval.

Inspection scope

Setting out, excavation formation, subgrade compaction, blinding, reinforcement, formwork, concrete placement and curing, joints, waterproofing, and backfill.

Typical hold, witness, and review points

Rebar inspection (Hold); pre-pour (Hold); waterproofing application (Hold); excavation formation (Witness); concrete placing (Witness).

Typical inspection records

ITRs, test results (FDT, slump, strengths), delivery tickets, rebar and formwork checklists, waterproofing QA tests, as-built survey, NCR/CAR.

Important approval note

This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.

Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.

Inspection and test plan

Activity Inspection / Test Acceptance Criteria Responsibility Record
Setting out and benchmarks Line/level verification with total station Control points established; line/level within ±5 mm; records completed. Surveyor / QC / Engineer (Witness) Survey report; ITR approved
Utility clearance Scan results/trial pit verification No-conflict confirmed or protection installed; Permit to Dig active. Site Engineer / HSE / Engineer (Witness) Utility clearance form; photos
Excavation to formation Level survey; stability/groundwater check Level +0/−50 mm; faces stable; dry or controlled water. QC / Engineer (Witness) Excavation ITR; survey sheet
Subgrade proof-rolling and compaction FDT (nuclear/sand cone) ≥95% MDD; firm, non-pumping. QC / Third-party lab FDT reports; ITR
Blinding concrete placement Slump, temp; cubes if specified Thickness 50–75 mm; level ±10 mm; curing commenced. QC / Engineer (Witness) Tickets; test results; ITR
Reinforcement inspection Bar size/spacing/lap/cover check As per drawings/BS 8666; cover 50–75 mm; clean and tied. QC / Engineer (Hold) Rebar ITR; checklist; photos
Formwork and dimensions Dimensional/plumb check; release agent applied Width/height ±10 mm; plumb ≤5 mm/1 m; grout-tight. QC / Engineer (Witness) Formwork ITR; checklist
Pre-pour inspection Pre-pour checklist All preceding NCRs closed; pour approval issued. QC / Engineer (Hold) Pre-pour ITR signed
Concrete delivery checks Ticket verification; time; mix ID Compliant with approved mix; within delivery time limits. QC Delivery tickets; log
Fresh concrete tests Slump (EN 12350-2/ASTM C143); temp; air (if specified); sampling (EN 12350-1/ASTM C172) Within specified slump/air/temperature ranges. QC / Lab Field test sheets; sample IDs
Concrete placing and vibration Observation vs ACI 304; vibration practice Layer ≤300–400 mm; no segregation; no rebar displacement. QC (Witness) / Site Engineer Pour log; photos
Curing and protection Curing application and duration check Curing continuous ≥7 days [Verify]; surfaces protected. QC Curing records
Construction joint preparation (if applicable) Surface roughness; cleanliness; bonding agent application ≥5 mm amplitude roughness; sound substrate; accessories installed. QC / Engineer (Hold) Joint prep ITR; photos
Waterproofing application Visual, spark/holiday test or adhesion (as specified) Continuous membrane; correct laps/DFT; terminations sealed; protection boards installed. QC / Engineer (Hold) Waterproofing ITR; test reports; manufacturer warranty (if any)
Backfilling adjacent to footing Layer thickness; FDT (as required) 92–95% MDD [Verify]; no membrane damage; maintain drainage path. QC Backfill ITR; FDT reports
As-built survey and documentation Survey check vs design Levels/dimensions within tolerance; QA dossier complete. Surveyor / QC / Engineer (Witness) As-built drawings; QA handover pack

This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.

Frequently asked questions

Typically one set per 50 m³ per day of casting or as specified. Verify with the project QA plan.

Yes, waterproofing application is commonly a Hold point to allow inspection and testing before backfilling.

Related method statement

This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement – Strip Footing Construction (Excavation to Waterproofing) method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.

View the Method Statement – Strip Footing Construction (Excavation to Waterproofing) method statement →

Related resources