G
Guest

Method Statement – Routine Inspection, Color-Coding, and Testing of Loose Lifting Tackle inspection and test plan example.

Inspection and Test Plan for Method Statement – Routine Inspection, Color-Coding, and Testing of Loose Lifting Tackle

AI-assisted inspection and test plan connected to a method statement, with PDF and Excel export.

Published 26 May 2026 Rev. 00 32 views
About this ITP: This ITP details hold/witness inspections for receiving, detailed checks, NDT, proof load, and color-tagging of lifting tackle. It defines acceptance criteria, roles, and records.

More than a static template

Unlike a downloadable Word or PDF template, this ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point directly connected to its method statement. Every inspection activity, hold point, and acceptance criterion is structured and ready to adapt to your project.

  • AI-assisted customization — Tailor inspection activities and acceptance criteria to your specific project scope.
  • Linked method statement — This ITP is connected to the corresponding method statement describing the work sequence.
  • Multiple export formats — Download as a formatted PDF or editable Excel spreadsheet.
  • Editable starting point, not a final document — Review and verify all content against your project specifications and standards before use.

What you can customize

When you save this ITP to your account, every inspection row becomes editable. You can add, remove, or modify:

  • Inspection activity — Description of what is being inspected.
  • Inspection type — Hold point (H), Witness point (W), Review (R), or Monitor (M).
  • Responsibility — Contractor, subcontractor, engineer, or client.
  • Frequency — How often the inspection occurs.
  • Acceptance criteria — Referenced standard or specification requirement.
  • Records — Forms, test reports, or checklists required as evidence.

Why this ITP is used

To ensure lifting accessories are safe, compliant, and traceable before release to service, minimizing risk of failure.

Who uses this inspection and test plan

Lifting Equipment Competent Person, Lifting Supervisor, Storekeeper, NDT technicians, and Third-Party Inspectors.

When this ITP is prepared and submitted

At receiving/return, routine intervals (monthly/quarterly), 6‑monthly thorough exams, and whenever proof load or NDT is due.

Who receives or approves this ITP

Contractor’s PM and Client/Third-Party Certifying Authority for review/approval [Verify].

Inspection scope

Covers ID verification, visual/dimensional checks, functional checks, document audits, NDT of critical areas, proof load testing, and tagging.

Typical hold, witness, and review points

Witness: proof load tests, NDT interpretation (as required). Hold: before color-tagging pending document/NDT result verification.

Typical inspection records

Inspection checklists, photos, updated register, NDT and load test certificates, calibration records, quarantine and disposal logs.

Important approval note

This ITP is an AI-assisted editable starting point, not a pre-approved document. Before use on any project, all inspection activities, hold points, and acceptance criteria must be reviewed and approved by the relevant parties (superintendent, principal contractor, or client representative) in accordance with your contract and project quality plan.

Always verify acceptance criteria against your applicable drawings, specifications, and regulatory requirements. Hold points must be confirmed with the relevant authority before work proceeds past that point.

Inspection and test plan

Activity Inspection / Test Acceptance Criteria Responsibility Record
Receiving and identification Check ID, serial, WLL, certificates on arrival/return Unique ID traceable; WLL and manufacturer marking legible; documentation available Storekeeper / LECP Goods-in log; photo record; register update
Pre-use user check (toolbox) Visual check for obvious damage; correct selection vs. load and geometry No visible defect; correct WLL; tag current quarter Rigger / User Daily checklist or sign-on sheet
Routine detailed inspection – Wire rope slings Broken wires count; kinks/birdcage; diameter at 3 points; ferrule/thimble Within ISO 4309/ASME B30.9 limits; no kinks/birdcage; diameter loss <10%; tag legible LECP Wire rope sling checklist; photos; register update
Routine detailed inspection – Shackles/hardware Wear on pin/body; thread condition; jaw spread; markings Wear <10% of original dia; threads fully engage; no deformation; markings legible per ASME B30.26 LECP Hardware inspection sheet; photos; register update
Routine detailed inspection – Chain slings Diameter wear; elongation; hook latch; master link Wear <10%; elongation <5%; no cracks/heat damage; tag legible per EN 818 LECP Chain sling inspection sheet
Routine detailed inspection – Textile slings Cuts/abrasion; chemical/heat damage; exposed core; label No cuts or exposed core; no melt/chemical damage; label legible per EN 1492 LECP Textile sling checklist
Spreader beam documentation audit Certificate review vs. serial; marking verification; visual condition Valid cert; serial/WLL match; no obvious damage LECP Spreader beam checklist; cert copy
NDT on spreader beam critical areas (if due) PT/MT per approved procedure; UV/lighting checks No relevant rejectable indications per procedure/ISO 23278 NDT Level II / LECP NDT report with indication maps
Proof load test (as required) Apply specified proof load; hold; re-inspect for set/deformation Proof load achieved without permanent deformation; test certificate issued LECP / Third-Party Inspector Load test certificate; load graph/printout; photos
Quarterly color tag application Correct color vs. posted chart; next due date marked Tag color correct; secure; not on load-bearing textile areas; ID visible Storekeeper / LECP Color tag log; photos
Quarantine and disposal of rejected gear Segregation and tag-out; render unusable before disposal No defective items in service area; disposal documented and irreversible LECP / Storekeeper Quarantine Register; Disposal Certificate; photos

This table is a read-only public reference. Download the PDF or Excel version, or customize this ITP to edit it for your project.

Frequently asked questions

Typically proof load testing and selected NDT on spreader beams; verify with client and regulatory requirements.

Generally no; slings are not routinely proof loaded due to potential damage. Use visual/dimensional checks per standards unless OEM/authority specifies otherwise.

By applicable standards (ASME/ISO/EN), OEM manuals, and project specifications. When values differ, the most conservative limit is applied after client approval.

Related method statement

This Inspection and Test Plan is associated with the Method Statement – Routine Inspection, Color-Coding, and Testing of Loose Lifting Tackle method statement, which describes the step-by-step construction sequence, resources, materials, equipment, safety controls, and environmental controls for this activity.

View the Method Statement – Routine Inspection, Color-Coding, and Testing of Loose Lifting Tackle method statement →

Continue with related inspection, method statement, article, and checklist resources.

Related resources