
The template seems comprehensive, but I'm curious about how it handles revisions after consultant feedback. Are there specific sections for tracking changes or updates to the inspection requests? That could enhance accountability further.
The template seems comprehensive, but I'm curious about how it handles revisions after consultant feedback. Are there specific sections for tracking changes or updates to the inspection requests? That could enhance accountability further.
It's interesting that the template includes a section for attachments. Have you considered adding a feature for version control? This could help track changes in documents submitted alongside inspection requests, ensuring clarity in revisions.
The inclusion of an attachments section is indeed valuable, Noah Schneider. It might also be helpful to have a dedicated area for noting the status of each attachment, such as whether they have been reviewed or require further updates. How do you think that could improve
Understanding the workflow of construction submittals is crucial for project success. Have you encountered any challenges in the resubmission process? It might be helpful to discuss strategies for effectively addressing feedback from consultants.
It's funny how a little piece of paper can make or break a contractor's day. Bid bonds really keep everyone on their toes!
I'm glad I read this, thanks
Looks like snaghere makes tracking snags a bit easier. Just hope the QR codes donβt lead to a surprise party!
Giovanni Rossi: Haha, I know what you mean! Iβd just hope the QR codes lead to the right snags and not a hidden treasure map!
I wonder if the QR codes will ever lead to a snag that turns out to be a wild goose chase. At least with snaghere, we can track them without getting lost!
π₯π₯