Loading...
Guest

As Planned Vs As Built image
As Planned Vs As Built
Apr 19, 2025
⏳ Estimated reading time: 3 min
Learn how As-Planned vs. As-Built analysis is used to evaluate construction delays. Understand the steps, advantages, challenges, and when to apply it for EOT claims or dispute resolution.
As-Planned vs. As-Built Analysis | Construction Delay Method

As-Planned vs. As-Built Analysis in Construction Projects

Introduction

As-Planned vs. As-Built analysis is one of the most commonly used retrospective methods for assessing construction delays. It compares what was originally scheduled (the as-planned program) to what actually happened (the as-built timeline) to determine the extent and cause of delays. It is widely accepted in post-project delay claims and disputes.


1. What Is As-Planned vs. As-Built?

This method involves overlaying the original construction schedule with actual progress records. Delays are identified by analyzing variances between planned and actual task start and finish dates. This approach helps determine whether delays were:

  • Caused by the contractor

  • Due to client-side issues

  • Unforeseen external factors

It’s best used after project completion or when sufficient actual data is available.

as planned vs as built analysis compare


2. How the Analysis Works

  • Step 1: Collect the baseline (as-planned) schedule and progress updates.

  • Step 2: Build or extract the as-built schedule using site records, daily reports, and updates.

  • Step 3: Compare activity-by-activity to highlight deviations.

  • Step 4: Identify impacts on the project’s critical path and completion date.


3. Example Application

If the as-planned schedule shows “Steel Delivery” on Day 45 but the as-built record shows it occurred on Day 70, the delay is 25 days. By checking if this task was on the critical path, the analyst can determine whether this delay impacted the overall project delivery.

as Planned vs As Built method real example


4. Contractual Relevance

Contracts such as FIDIC, NEC, and JCT accept this method for evaluating claims after delays have occurred, especially when prospective methods like TIA are no longer suitable.

However, its reliability depends on:

  • A valid baseline schedule

  • Accurate and detailed as-built records


5. Pros and Cons

Aspect Pros Cons
Timing Good for completed or nearly-complete projects Not useful for live project forecasting
Simplicity Clear comparison of scheduled vs. actual May oversimplify complex concurrent delays
Acceptance Common in arbitration Can be challenged if records are inconsistent

6. Common Challenges

  • Inconsistent or missing progress updates

  • Manipulation of as-built data to influence outcome

  • Overlooking logical sequencing and float consumption

  • Not accounting for weather or force majeure impacts


7. Best Practices

  • Maintain detailed daily logs, schedules, and updates throughout the project.

  • Use software like Primavera P6 or MS Project with audit trails.

  • Pair this method with delay event logs and change order records for better accuracy.


8. Tools to Support Your Delay Analysis

Accurate As-Planned vs. As-Built analysis starts with structured documentation and clarity. To streamline your delay evaluation and EOT claims, download these free, ready-to-use tools:


Conclusion

As-Planned vs. As-Built is a foundational technique for understanding construction delays after the fact. When supported by reliable data and used with critical path analysis, it provides a clear view of what went wrong, when, and why—making it valuable in both claims preparation and forensic delay analysis.

Elie Saad's photo
Elie Saad
Apr 19, 2025
7
48
381
847

Frequently Asked Questions about As Planned Vs As Built


FAQ

Q: What is As-Planned vs. As-Built analysis in construction?

A: It’s a retrospective method comparing the original project schedule with the actual sequence of work. For example, if an activity was planned to finish on Day 50 but actually finished on Day 65, the delay = 65 - 50 = 15 days. This variance helps pinpoint responsibility and impact.

FAQ

Q: When is As-Planned vs. As-Built analysis used?

A: It's typically used post-project, especially when submitting Extension of Time (EOT) claims. For instance, if your as-built timeline shows cumulative delays of 30+ days on the critical path, this analysis helps justify time entitlement.

FAQ

Q: Is As-Planned vs. As-Built accepted in arbitration or court?

A: Yes. Industry data shows that over 60% of retrospective delay claims presented in formal dispute settings use this method or a variation of it. Its success depends on maintaining daily reports, approved baseline schedules, and consistent progress updates.

FAQ

Q: What are the main limitations of this method?

A: It does not account for logic-driven float consumption or concurrency unless combined with Critical Path Method (CPM) analysis. A delay on a non-critical activity might show a variance but not affect the project’s finish date, so not all delays equal entitlement.

FAQ

Q: How does it compare to Time Impact Analysis (TIA)?

A: As-Planned vs. As-Built looks backward, TIA looks forward. If TIA inserts a 10-day fragnet into an ongoing schedule, As-Planned vs. As-Built would reveal a 10-day overrun only after the event occurred. Both can be used together for more robust delay justification.

Related Checklists


Elevator Pit and Machine Room Inspection Checklist
✅ 10 items
Elevator Pit and Machine Room Inspection Checklist
This checklist is designed for professionals tasked with inspecting elevator pits and machine rooms prior to equipment installation. It ensures that all necessary preparations, safety checks, and compliance measures are thoroughly addressed. By following this comprehensive guide, inspectors can identify potential issues that could delay installation or pose safety risks. Regular use of this checklist helps maintain high standards of safety, operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance.
Acoustic Performance and Sound Insulation Inspection
✅ 14 items
Acoustic Performance and Sound Insulation Inspection
Acoustic performance and sound insulation are critical components of building design and construction, ensuring sound control and privacy. This inspection checklist covers the evaluation of materials and construction methods used to achieve optimal acoustic performance. It focuses on assessing the effectiveness of sound barriers, insulation materials, and construction techniques used in walls, floors, and ceilings. Ensuring proper acoustic performance mitigates issues such as noise pollution and enhances occupant comfort and privacy. This interactive checklist allows you to tick off items, leave comments, and export your findings as PDF or Excel with a unique QR code for verification.
Carpentry and Joinery Installation Inspection Checklist
✅ 15 items
Carpentry and Joinery Installation Inspection Checklist
This Carpentry and Joinery Installation Inspection Checklist is designed to guide construction professionals in assessing the quality and accuracy of carpentry and joinery work on site. Whether you are a site manager, a quality assurance inspector, or a skilled tradesperson, this checklist provides a structured approach to ensuring installations meet industry standards and client specifications. It covers essential aspects such as materials, workmanship, safety, and compliance, helping you to identify and address potential issues before they escalate. Proper inspections not only enhance the durability and safety of the structures but also ensure customer satisfaction and project success.
Site Survey and Layout Benchmark Inspection Checklist
✅ 15 items
Site Survey and Layout Benchmark Inspection Checklist
The site survey and layout benchmark inspection is a crucial preparatory phase in construction projects. It involves verifying the accuracy of the site's initial survey and the placement of layout benchmarks before any physical work begins. This step ensures that the project aligns with design specifications and prevents costly errors and delays. This checklist provides a comprehensive guide to inspecting various aspects of site surveys and benchmarks, helping professionals ensure quality and compliance. Users can interact with this checklist online, ticking off items, adding comments, and exporting the report as a PDF or Excel file, complete with QR code authentication for traceability.
Soil Compaction and Geotechnical Test Inspection Checklist
✅ 12 items
Soil Compaction and Geotechnical Test Inspection Checklist
Inspecting soil compaction and geotechnical test results is a critical step before commencing foundation works. It involves assessing the soil's ability to support structures, ensuring that it meets the necessary compaction standards and geotechnical parameters. This checklist outlines the key tasks to verify soil conditions, including compaction tests, moisture content checks, and review of geotechnical reports. By following this guide, construction projects can mitigate risks such as foundation settling or failure, ensuring structural integrity. Utilize our interactive checklist to tick off completed tasks, add comments, and export the results as a PDF or Excel document, complete with a unique QR code for authenticity.

Related Articles


Collapsed As Built
⏳ 3 min read
Collapsed As-built (but-for) Analysis | Construction Delay Method
Discover how Collapsed As-Built (But-For) analysis helps evaluate delays in completed construction projects. Learn when to use it, how it works, and how it supports forensic delay claims.
Time Impact Analysis
⏳ 2 min read
Time Impact Analysis (tia) | Construction Delay Method
Master Time Impact Analysis (TIA), the leading prospective method for assessing construction delays. Understand its use, contract requirements, and best practices.
Impacted As Planned
⏳ 3 min read
Impacted As-planned Analysis | Construction Delay Method
Understand how Impacted As-Planned (IAP) analysis is used to model construction delays based on baseline schedules. Learn how to perform IAP, when to use it, and how it compares to TIA and other delay methods.
Windows Analysis
⏳ 3 min read
Windows Analysis | Construction Delay Evaluation Method
Learn how Windows Analysis blends prospective and retrospective methods to accurately evaluate construction delays. Explore window selection, critical path shifts, and legal considerations.
Delay Analysis Construction
⏳ 4 min read
Delay Analysis In Construction | Methods, Legal Claims, Eot Tools, And Ai Assistant
Learn about top delay analysis methods in construction, legal strategies for EOT claims, and access free tools including the free DelayClaims AI Assistant, method selector excel and others.